- ReFS outperforms NTFS in integrity and scalability, providing self-correcting errors and support for huge files and volumes.
- NTFS is known for its universal compatibility, advanced features like compression, encryption, and disk quotas, and is still required for installing and booting Windows.
- ReFS is the best choice for virtualized environments and servers, while NTFS is ideal for general use and interoperability with external software and devices.
The world of data storage in Windows has evolved significantly with the emergence of new file systems that promise improved integrity, performance, and scalability compared to traditional solutions. Today, the choice is reduced to two options: ReFS vs NTFS.
La comparison between ReFS (Resilient File System) and NTFS (New Technology File System) It's one of the most common debates among system administrators, IT professionals, and advanced users looking to choose the best technology for demanding environments, servers, backups, or everyday tasks. In this article, we delve deeper into this topic.
What is NTFS? The versatile and established Windows system
NTFS is the Microsoft Classic File System, introduced in 1993 with Windows NT and a standard ever since. Its maturity and ability to work in most environments mean it continues to be found by default in Windows 10, 11, all Windows Servers, and a multitude of professional and home devices and applications.
Among its great assets are Flexibility, extended compatibility and a huge collection of advanced features which have allowed it to become the preferred option for hard drives, SSDs, external drives, servers, storage networks, and even multimedia or video surveillance devices. NTFS It is, to date, the only file system capable of hosting boot partitions and running Windows systems, which is essential for personal computers, laptops, and many business solutions.
- Key features of NTFS: Support for large files and volumes (up to 256 TB per file); access control lists (ACLs) for advanced permissions; file system-level compression and encryption; journaling (to prevent corruption due to power outages or crashes); per-user disk quotas; a wealth of metadata; and support for symbolic links, mount points, and hard links.
- Additional advantages: It is optimized for multipurpose use, offers full integration with Windows features, and is compatible with a wide range of backup software applications, antivirus, recovery utilities, and third-party tools.
- Compatibility issue: It works on all versions of Windows and can be read (albeit with some limitations) from Linux systems, macOS, and modern storage hardware.
What is ReFS? Microsoft's modern, resilient file system
ReFS emerged in 2012 as response to the new needs of enterprise storage, virtualization environments, large-scale data protection and cloud environmentsDesigned to overcome some of the limitations of NTFS and address its weaknesses in the areas of corruption and large volume management, ReFS has been progressively evolving in each version of Windows Server, and most recently in Windows Pro for Workstations and Advanced editions of Windows 10 and Windows 11.
The essence of Refs es the resilience: an enhanced ability to protect, repair, and operate on data even in the face of hardware failure, corruption, or power failures. It also boasts tremendous scalability and several unique features that boost performance, especially for virtualization and critical backup storage.
- Key features of ReFS: End-to-end verified data integrity using optional file and metadata checksums; automatic error self-healing when used with Storage Spaces or Storage Spaces Direct; proactive periodic scans (scrubber) to identify and remediate corruption without manual intervention; support for massive files and volumes (up to 35 PB per volume); unique capabilities for virtualized workloads such as block cloning, sparse VDL (instant VHD creation), and mirror-accelerated parity.
- Additional advantages: ReFS is optimized to minimize the impact of fragmentation, reduce downtime, and maximize data availability in critical or high-demand scenarios.
- Compatibility issues: Although it is increasingly supported in more versions, it is not possible to use it as a boot system, nor is it usually available in standard Windows Home installations, and it has certain limitations in encryption, compression and compatibility with some older software and utilities.
ReFS vs NTFS: Technical Differences
Let's take a closer look at the key differences between ReFS and NTFS: what each can and can't do.
Comparative table of characteristics and limits
| Functionality / Feature | NTFS | Refs |
|---|---|---|
| Booting the operating system | Yes | No |
| File Encryption (EFS) | Yes | No |
| BitLocker (full disk encryption) | Yes | Yes |
| File compression | Yes | No |
| Data deduplication | Yes | Yes (on versions 1709/Server 2019 and later) |
| Disk Quotas | Yes | No |
| Transactions | Yes | No |
| ODX (Offloaded Data Transfer) | Yes | No |
| Symbolic links (soft/hard) | Yes | Limited Time |
| Block cloning | No | Yes |
| Sparse VDL (instant VHD creation) | No | Yes |
| Reflex accelerated parity | No | Yes |
| File-level snapshots | No | Yes (Server 2022+) |
| Support for extended metadata | Yes | Limited Time |
| Maximum file size | 256 TB | 35 PB |
| Maximum volume size | 256 TB | 35 PB |
| Maximum path/file length | 255/32.000 characters | 255/32.000 characters |
| Cluster size | 512B – 64K | 4K / 64K |
| Scattered files | Yes | Yes |
| CSV (Cluster Shared Volumes) support | Yes | Yes (with nuances) |
| Junction points, assembly, reanalysis | Yes | Yes |
| Pagefile support | Yes | Limited (since ReFS 3.7) |
| Removable media support | Yes | No |
As you can see, in the ReFS vs NTFS confrontation, the former is far ahead in scalability and resilience, but it still lacks features that many users in this confrontation may need, especially if you are coming from NTFS.
Scalability: Huge differences in capacity and performance
La difference in capacity When we analyze NTFS vs ReFS it is huge. NTFS, although in theory it supports up to 16 exabytes, In practice, in Windows environments it is limited to 256 TB for both files and volumes, while ReFS breaks all limits allowing up to 35 petabytes in files and volumes, a figure that multiplies by more than 135 times the realistic capacity of NTFS.
This is vital when working with enterprise environments, mass storage, large data pools, multi-server backups, or virtualization systems with hundreds of virtual disks. Additionally, ReFS handles fragmentation and large sequential file management better., thanks in part to its internal structure based on B+ trees and copy-on-write design, which reduces I/O operations and improves efficiency for mammoth files.
Data integrity and resilience: the great revolution of ReFS
ReFS was created to protect against accidental or silent data corruption and loss., a problem that can be catastrophic in critical environments. Its main advantages are:
- Integrity sequences and checksums in all metadata and, optionally, in file data. This allows ReFS to automatically detect, identify, and even repair corruption without human intervention or the need to run CHKDSK-type utilities.
- Deep integration with Storage Spaces and Storage Spaces Direct, providing instant redundancy: upon detecting corrupted data in a mirror or parity space, ReFS corrects it using the existing healthy copy, keeping the volumes online and with no direct impact on service availability.
- Proactive bug fixing using the debugger (integrity scrubber), which periodically scans the volume for latent corruptions in the background and repairs them autonomously.
Performance and virtualization: where ReFS excels
One of ReFS's key features is its superior performance on virtualized workloads thanks to unique features:
- Block cloning: Accelerates virtual disk duplication, snapshots, and copy operations in Hyper-V environments and other platforms. For example, it allows you to merge checkpoints almost instantly.
- Sparse VDL: allows you to create fixed-size virtual disk files (VHD/X) in seconds, whereas with NTFS it could take tens of minutes.
- Reflex accelerated parity: Divides storage into two tiers (performance and capacity), optimizing the use of SSDs for active operations and moving less-used data to slower disks without manual intervention.
Current limitations and shortcomings of ReFS: how far it can go
Not everything is perfect with ReFSAlthough its potential is enormous, it is clearly geared toward enterprise scenarios, servers, and critical storage tasks. The main current limitations are:
- Does not allow installing or booting Windows from ReFS volumesIf you need a bootable disk, NTFS is still required.
- Does not support file compression or encryption at the file system level (EFS)If these features are essential, you'll need to opt for NTFS or BitLocker (which is supported).
- It lacks disk quotas, extended attributes, short names, transactions, and removable storage support. (pendrives, SD).
- Limited compatibility with certain older utilities and third-party backup softwareAlthough integration improves each year, some very specific programs may not recognize some advanced metadata or security features.
Recommended use cases for NTFS and ReFS
When is it convenient to use each file system? Microsoft best practices and recommendations and advanced user experience include:
- Use NTFS if:
- You need maximum compatibility and flexibility.
- You need file compression, quotas, data encryption, transactions, or the use of an external or bootable drive.
- You work in mixed environments or with tools that don't support ReFS.
- You prioritize compatibility with legacy applications or traditional home and office scenarios.
- Choose ReFS if:
- You manage large volumes of critical data, backups, virtual machine files, snapshots or virtualized workloads (Hyper-V, VDI…)
- Integrity, self-detection and repair of errors, and maximum availability are priorities.
- You use Storage Spaces / Storage Spaces Direct, hybrid SSD/HDD systems on servers, or large enterprise storage pools.
- You need extreme scalability and optimization for hot/cold storage.
As you can see, the decision between ReFS vs NTFS is not black or white. Both options have their own niche, And the key is to choose based on your real needs, the type of data you're going to store, and the infrastructure you have.
At present, ReFS is already the dominant option for large-volume storage, file servers, backup repositories, and next-generation virtualized environments thanks to its self-protection and intelligent volume management. However, NTFS remains indispensable for traditional tasks, home machines, and system booting, and maintains its strengths in compatibility and flexibility.
Editor specialized in technology and internet issues with more than ten years of experience in different digital media. I have worked as an editor and content creator for e-commerce, communication, online marketing and advertising companies. I have also written on economics, finance and other sectors websites. My work is also my passion. Now, through my articles in Tecnobits, I try to explore all the news and new opportunities that the world of technology offers us every day to improve our lives.